Beyond the Deep State: An Overview of the Shadow Government

In the last several years, the so-called “Deep State”, has become a trending topic; however, this particular terminology is but a superficial catch-phrase of a much deeper and far more sinister global agenda to enslave humanity. The following information has been compiled as merely a starting point for your personal study and research. Due diligence and discernment are highly advised and encouraged.

The “Deep State” is the surface layer of the Shadow Government.  The “Deep State” is the administrative and bureaucratic arm of the Shadow Government and consists of unelected–and arguably, predominantly unwitting pawns in a global power game–government employees, from local and state levels, to the federal government.  See this information in regard to the Senior Executive Service (https://aim4truth.org/2018/01/03/deep-state-shadow-government-revealed-senior-executive-service/).

Shadow Government Factions:

Freemasons/Knights Templar/Ordo Templi Orientis/Knights of Malta

Bavarian Illuminati

Royal Institute of International Affairs

Rand Corporation

Committee of 300

Council of Foreign Relations

Trilateral Commission

Bilderberg Group

Jesuits

Zionists

Federal Reserve/International Monetary Fund/World Bank/Bank for International Settlements

The 3-City Empire


History of Freemasonry

No one knows with certainty how or when the Masonic Fraternity was formed. A widely accepted theory among Masonic scholars is that it arose from the stonemasons’ guilds during the Middle Ages. The language and symbols used in the fraternity’s rituals come from this era. The oldest document that makes reference to Masons is the Regius Poem, printed about 1390, which was a copy of an earlier work. In 1717, four lodges in London formed the first Grand Lodge of England, and records from that point on are more complete.

Within thirty years, the fraternity had spread throughout Europe and the American Colonies. Freemasonry became very popular in colonial America. George Washington was a Mason, Benjamin Franklin served as the head of the fraternity in Pennsylvania, as did Paul Revere and Joseph Warren in Massachusetts. Other well-known Masons involved with the founding of America included John Hancock, John Sullivan, Lafayette, Baron Fredrick von Stuben, Nathanael Greene, and John Paul Jones. Another Mason, Chief Justice John Marshall, shaped the Supreme Court into its present form.

Over the centuries, Freemasonry has developed into a worldwide fraternity emphasizing personal study, self-improvement, and social betterment via individual involvement and philanthropy. During the late 1700s it was one of the organizations most responsible for spreading the ideals of the Enlightenment: the dignity of man and the liberty of the individual, the right of all persons to worship as they choose, the formation of democratic governments, and the importance of public education. Masons supported the first public schools in both Europe and America.

During the 1800s and early 1900s, Freemasonry grew dramatically. At that time, the government had provided no social “safety net”. The Masonic tradition of founding orphanages, homes for widows, and homes for the aged provided the only security many people knew.

Today in North America, the Masonic Fraternity continues this tradition by giving almost $1.5 million each day to causes that range from operating children’s hospitals, providing treatment for childhood language disorders, treating eye diseases, funding medical research, contributing to local community service, and providing care to Masons and their families at Masonic Homes.

The four million Masons worldwide continue to help men and women face the problems of the 21st century by building bridges of brotherhood and instilling in the hearts of men ideals for a better tomorrow.

Masonic Service Association of North America (READ MORE)


Freemasonry & the Knights Templar

As a historical institution, the Order of the Temple of Solomon is distinctly “Non-Masonic”.  This neutral description objectively reflects the following facts:  (1) The chivalric Order of the Temple of Solomon of the Middle Ages never merged into the later fraternity of Freemasonry of the Renaissance; (2) Freemasonry does not claim to be an Order of Chivalry, as it does not possess the Fons Honourum to grant official Knighthood in nobility; (3) Freemasons do not receive chivalric Knighthood nor such peerage title by achieving any Masonic “Templar” Degree; and (4) Knights and Dames of the Templar Order do not become members of any Masonic fraternity by receiving chivalric Knighthood.

Notwithstanding this clear separation of two distinct traditions, with different practices, Freemasonry and the Templar Order do share one significant moment of an intersecting point on the timeline of history, which created some shared affinities for ancient knowledge:

In the 15th century, surviving Templars taught stonemasons some Gothic building techniques and sacred geometry, which inspired the esoteric foundations of Freemasonry.  For this reason, the higher levels of Freemasonry have honourary “Knights Templar” themed Masonic Degrees and Masonic Orders, named in tribute to the earlier Templars.  Freemasonry was thus established approximately 330 years after the chivalric Knights Templar, making them separate organizations, each with their own unique heritage in its own right.

The positive tradition of Freemasonry is often mistakenly confused with a negative secret society generally known as the “Illuminati”.  The infamous “Bavarian Illuminati” has sometimes infiltrated and misused the fraternity of Freemasonry, as well as several other respectable groups.  The 18th century “Illuminati” was created another full 330 years after the Masonic fraternity, such that authentic Freemasonry itself does not espouse nor embody any principles of that later secret society.  As a result, the Order of the Temple of Solomon is a formidable 660 years older than the “Illuminati”, with no connection whatsoever to that subversive counter-culture, not even indirectly.

The Sovereign Magistral Order of the Temple of Solomon offers its support to Freemasons and their Lodges, in friendship, to help restore and preserve the original, authentic and uncorrupted Freemasonry, by replenishing it with the full depth of the most ancient knowledge of the Temple of Solomon which originally inspired the Masonic tradition.

The Order recognizes authentic Freemasons as kindred spirits, who share an inspiration and passion for ancient esoteric knowledge of the divine mechanics of consciousness of the universe. That common characteristic of both Masons and Templars should be honoured, and is sufficient and compelling reason to ensure friendly and mutually supportive relations between them.

Therefore, with the modern restoration and public re-emergence of the Templar Order, Freemasons now have the historic opportunity to personally experience precisely the same interaction and mentorship from the direct continuation of the original Knights Templar of the 12th century, as the very first Freemasons enjoyed in the 15th century.

KnightsTemplarOrder.org (READ MORE)


Ordo Templi Orientis

From Thelemapedia

Ordo Templi Orientis (O.T.O.) can be translated as Order of Oriental Templars, or Order of the Temple of the East. It is a secret, fraternal organization similar to that of Freemasonry, with a series of graded initations. For its teachings and principles of organization, it has accepted the Law of Thelema, which is expressed as “Do what thou wilt.” Thelemites believe that this Law was established with the writing of the Book of the Law by Aleister Crowley in 1904 in Cairo, Egypt.

Philosophy & Goals

According to Crowley, O.T.O. is “the first of the great religious Societies to accept the Law.” The rituals of O.T.O. have been entirely revised by Crowley and his successors in light of the Law of Thelema. Both within its private ceremonies and in the world at large, the Order seeks to promote the Law as the ultimate standard of human conduct and understanding.

O.T.O. was also designated as the Crowley estate, and maintains possession of Crowley’s intellectual property and literary remains. As the custodian of these materials, the Order seeks to make them available to the public in definitive editions.

Even before accepting the Law, the Sovereign Sanctuary of the O.T.O. was a body that maintained a Supreme Secret, which is said to be of inestimable magical power. This secret still reposes in the Sovereign Sanctuary of the Ninth Degree, and its nature is indicated gradually by hints in the initiatory ceremonies of the Order.

In common with Freemasonry, the Theosophical Society, and many other esoteric bodies, O.T.O. espouses an ethic of Universal Brotherhood.

Of the entire system of O.T.O., Crowley wrote in Confessions:

It offers a rational basis for universal brotherhood and for universal religion. It puts forward a scientific statement which is a summary of all that is at present known about the universe by means of a simple, yet sublime symbolism, artistically arranged. It also enables each man to discover for himself his personal destiny, indicates the moral and intellectual qualities which he requires in order to fulfil it freely, and finally puts in his hands an unimaginably powerful weapon which he may use to develop in himself every faculty which he may need in his work.

The mission of O.T.O. U.S. Grand Lodge, which can largely be applied to the Order as a whole:

Ordo Templi Orientis U.S.A. is the U.S. Grand Lodge (National Section) of Ordo Templi Orientis, a hierarchical, religious membership organization. Our mission is to effect and promote the doctrines and practices of the philosophical and religious system known as Thelema, with particular emphasis on cultivating the ideals of individual liberty, self-discipline, self-knowledge, and universal brotherhood. To this end, we conduct sacramental and initiatory rites, offer guidance and instruction to our members, organize social events, and engage in educational and community service activities at locations throughout the United States.

Activities

O.T.O. has two core areas of ritual activity: initiation into the Mysteries, and the celebration of Liber XV, the Gnostic Mass. In addition, the Order organizes lectures, classes, social events, theatrical productions and artistic exhibitions, and publishes books, journals, and newsletters.

Thelemapedia.org (READ MORE)


Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of St John of Jerusalem of Rhodes and of Malta

The birth of the Order of St. John dates back to around 1048. Merchants from the ancient Marine Republic of Amalfi obtained from the Caliph of Egypt the authorisation to build a church, convent and hospital in Jerusalem, to care for pilgrims of any religious faith or race.

The Order of St. John of Jerusalem – the monastic community which ran the hospital – became independent under the guidance of its founder, Blessed Gérard. Pope Paschal II approved the foundation of the Hospital with the Bull of 15th February 1113, and placed it under the aegis of the Church, granting it the right to freely elect its superiors without interference from other lay or religious authorities. By virtue of the Papal Bull, the Hospital became a lay-religious order. All the knights were religious, bound by the three monastic vows of poverty, chastity and obedience.

The constitution of the Kingdom of Jerusalem obliged the Order to take on the military defence of the sick and the pilgrims, as well as guarding its medical centres and main roads. The Order thus added the task of defending the faith to that of its hospitaller mission. As time went on, the Order adopted the white eight-pointed cross that is still its symbol today.

OrderOfMalta.int (READ MORE)


Meet the Man Who Started the Illuminati

How did a Bavarian professor end up creating a group that would be at the center of two centuries of conspiracy theories?

The 18th-century German thinker Adam Weishaupt would have been stunned if he had known his ideas would one day fuel global conspiracy theories, and inspire best-selling novels and blockbuster films.

Until he was 36, the vast majority of his compatriots would have been equally stunned to discover that this outwardly respectable professor was a dangerous enemy of the state, whose secret society, the Illuminati, was seen to threaten the very fabric of society.

Born in 1748 in Ingolstadt, a city in the Electorate of Bavaria (now part of modern-day Germany), Weishaupt was a descendant of Jewish converts to Christianity. Orphaned at a young age, his scholarly uncle took care of his education, and enrolled him in a Jesuit school. After completing his studies, Weishaupt became a professor of natural and canon law at the University of Ingolstadt, married, and started a family. On the surface, it was a conventional enough career—until 1784 when the Bavarian state learned of his incendiary ideas.

Secret Rituals, Intimate Details

Freemasons, like many secret societies, held initiation ceremonies.
Image courtesy Bridgeman/ACI
Engraving from 1733

Secret papers seized by the Bavarian authorities revealed fascinating details about the rituals of the Illuminati. A novice preparing to pass to the higher level of minerval, for example, had to present a detailed report on the titles of the books he owned, the identity of his enemies, and the weak points of his character. Upon initiation as a minerval, he promised to sacrifice all personal interests to those of the society.

A closer look at his upbringing, however, reveals that Weishaupt always had a restless mind. As a boy he was an avid reader, consuming books by the latest French Enlightenment philosophers in his uncle’s library. Bavaria at that time was deeply conservative and Catholic. Weishaupt was not the only one who believed that the monarchy and the church were repressing freedom of thought.

Convinced that religious ideas were no longer an adequate belief system to govern modern societies, he decided to find another form of “illumination,” a set of ideas and practices that could be applied to radically change the way European states were run.

Freemasonry was steadily expanding throughout Europe in this period, offering attractive alternatives to freethinkers. Weishaupt initially thought of joining a lodge. Disillusioned with many of the Freemasons’ ideas, however, he became absorbed in books dealing with such esoteric themes as the Mysteries of the Seven Sages of Memphis and the Kabbala, and decided to found a new secret society of his own.

Society of Secrets

Weishaupt was not, he said, against religion itself, but rather the way in which it was practiced and imposed. His thinking, he wrote, offered freedom “from all religious prejudices; cultivates the social virtues; and animates them by a great, a feasible, and speedy prospect of universal happiness.” To achieve this, it was necessary to create “a state of liberty and moral equality, freed from the obstacles which subordination, rank, and riches, continually throw in our way.”

On the night of May 1, 1776, the first Illuminati met to found the order in a forest near Ingolstadt. Bathed in torchlight, there were five men. There they established the rules that were to govern the order. All future candidates for admission required the members’ consent, a strong reputation with well-established familial and social connections, and wealth.

In the beginning, the order’s membership had three levels: novices, minervals, and illuminated minervals. “Minerval” referred to the Roman goddess of wisdom, Minerva, reflecting the order’s aim to spread true knowledge, or illumination, about how society, and the state, might be reshaped.

National Geographic (READ MORE)


The Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House)

Over the course of our long history, the institute has offered solutions grounded in certain core principles.

In 1919 British and American delegates to the Paris Peace Conference, under the leadership of Lionel Curtis, conceived the idea of an Anglo-American Institute of foreign affairs to study international problems with a view to preventing future wars.

In the event, the British Institute of International Affairs was founded separately in London in July 1920. The American delegates developed the Council on Foreign Relations in New York as a sister institute.

In 1923, the Institute acquired, through the gift of Colonel RW Leonard, Chatham House, Number 10 St. James’s Square. The listed building was home to three prime ministers (William Pitt the Elder, Edward Stanley and William Gladstone).

In 1926, the Institute received its Royal Charter, thereupon being known as the Royal Institute of International Affairs. The Charter set out the aims and objectives of the Institute, reaffirming its wish to ‘advance the sciences of international politics…promote the study and investigation of international questions by means of lectures and discussion…promote the exchange of information, knowledge and thought on international affairs’.

1929 marked the inception of the Institute’s special study group on the international gold problem. The group, which included leading economists such as John Maynard Keynes, conducted a three year study into the developing economic issues which the post-war international monetary settlement created. The group’s research anticipated Britain’s decision to abandon the gold standard two years later.

Around this time Chatham House became known as the place for leading statesmen and actors in world affairs to visit when in London; notably, Mahatma Gandhi visited the institute on 20 October 1931, in which he delivered a talk on ‘The Future of India’.

In 1933, Chatham House also held the first in a series of unofficial Commonwealth Relations Conferences to consider the challenges facing the increasingly independent members of the Commonwealth.

In 1937, Robert Cecil was also awarded the Nobel Prize for his commitment to, and defence of, the League of Nations and the pursuit for peace and disarmament amongst its members.

The outbreak of WWII led the chairman, Lord Astor, to decentralize the Institute, with the majority of staff moving to Balliol College, Oxford. Throughout the war years the Institute worked closely with the Foreign Office who requested various reports on foreign press, historical and political background of the enemy and various other topics.

The Institute also provided many additional services to scholars and the armed forces. Research facilities were opened to refugee and allied academics, whilst arrangements were made for both the National Institute of Economic and Social Research and the Polish Research Centre to relocate to the Institute following the bombing of their premises.

In addition, allied officers undertook courses in international affairs at the Institute in an attempt to develop their international and political awareness.

Chatham House had been researching potential post-war issues as early as 1939 through the Committee on Reconstruction. While a number of staff returned to the Institute at the end of the war, a proportion of members found themselves joining a range of international organizations, including the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund.

In reaction to the changing post-war world, Chatham House embarked on a number of studies relating to Britain and the Commonwealth’s new political stature and the development of the Cold War.

The Institute held a series of conference on European questions and Western defence in cooperation with the Centre d’études de politiques étrangeres and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik.

Following the Cuban missile crisis and Brazilian coup d’état, the Institute also developed a growing focus on the Latin American region.

A study group on ‘Europe since 1972’ was set up as part of a wider examination of the benefits and implications of the enlargement of the European Economic Community (EEC), including Britain’s accession in 1973.

In October 1975 the first Anglo-Soviet round-table was held, beginning a series of meetings between Chatham House and the Institute of World Economy and International Relations in Moscow.

As an early example of two-track diplomacy, the meeting sought to develop closer communication and improved relations between Britain and the Soviet Union, one of the first such attempts in the Cold War.

At the start of the 1980s, the Council moved to expand the Institute’s research capabilities in two key emerging areas. The first modern programmes to be created under this initiative were the Energy and Research Programme and the International Economics Programme, formed in 1981.

In addition to reshaping its research practices, the Institute also sought to strengthen its international network, notably among economically prosperous nations. For example, Chatham House’s Far East programme was bolstered by the support of the Japan 2000 group in 1984.

ChathamHouse.org (READ MORE)


RAND is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization. Our research is sponsored by U.S. government agencies; U.S. state and local governments; non-U.S. governments, agencies, and ministries; international organizations; colleges and universities; foundations; professional associations; other nonprofit organizations; and industry.

In addition, we rely on philanthropic support to reach beyond the scope of client-sponsored work to tackle questions that may be too big, too complex, or too new for our clients to address.

Current clients can learn more about their projects from the relevant RAND business contacts.

Revenue*

$318.7M

Office of the U.S. Secretary of Defense and other national security agencies($69.7M)
Other federal agencies($16.4M)
State and local government agencies($6.6M)
Non-U.S. government agencies and international NGOs($13.9M)
Universities($0.7M)
Other nonprofit organizations($5.2M)
Foundations($23.9M)
Philanthropic contributions($9.9M)
Private sector($3.3M)
Other($1.4M)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and related agencies($66.1M)
U.S. Army($43.8M)
U.S. Air Force($48.9M)
U.S. Department of Homeland Security($8.9M)

*FY2017, net of subcontracts and RAND-initiated research.

List of Clients and Grantors

U.S. Government

  • Administrative Office of the United States Courts
  • Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
  • Department of Commerce
    • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • Department of Defense
    • Defense Centers of Excellence
    • Defense Contract Management Agency
    • Defense Security Cooperation Agency
    • Department of the Air Force
    • Department of the Army
      • Medical Research Acquisition Activity
    • Department of the Navy
      • Marine Corps
      • Naval Postgraduate School
    • Joint Special Operations Command
    • Joint Staff
    • Office of the Secretary of Defense
      • Office of the Director, Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation
      • Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics
        • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
      • Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness
      • Under Secretary of Defense for Policy
    • Special Operations Joint Task Force–Afghanistan
    • Unified Combatant Commands
  • Department of Education
    • Institute of Education Sciences
  • Department of Energy
    • National Renewable Energy Laboratory
  • Department of Health and Human Services
    • Administration for Children and Families
    • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
    • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
    • Health Resources and Services Administration
    • National Institutes of Health
      • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
      • National Cancer Institute
      • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health
      • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
      • National Institute on Aging
      • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
      • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
      • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
      • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
      • National Institute on Drug Abuse
      • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
      • National Institute of Mental Health
      • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
      • National Institute of Nursing Research
  • Department of Homeland Security
    • Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office
      • Domestic Nuclear Detection Office
      • Office of Health Affairs
    • DHS–HQ
    • Federal Emergency Management Agency
    • National Protection and Programs Directorate
    • Office of Strategy, Policy, and Plans
    • Science and Technology Directorate
    • Transportation Security Administration
    • U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
    • U.S. Coast Guard
    • U.S. Customs and Border Protection
  • Department of Justice
    • National Institute of Justice
      • Office of Justice Programs
  • Department of Labor
  • Department of State
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Federal Communications Commission
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • National Science Foundation
  • Office of the Director of National Intelligence
    • Intelligence Community

U.S. State and Local Governments

  • Commonwealth of Massachusetts
    • Department of Public Health
  • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
    • County of Allegheny
    • Pittsburgh Public Schools
  • Commonwealth of Virginia
    • Office of the Attorney General
  • State of California
    • City of Santa Monica
    • Department of Industrial Relations
    • Department of Social Services
    • Los Angeles County
      • First 5 LA
      • Metropolitan Transportation Authority
      • Probation Department
  • State of Delaware
  • State of Illinois
    • City of Chicago
  • State of Louisiana
    • City of New Orleans
  • State of Michigan
    • Michigan Indigent Defense Commission
  • State of New York
    • NYC Opportunity
    • Office of Indigent Legal Services
  • State of Ohio
    • Cincinnati Public Schools
  • State of Oregon
    • Multnomah County Health Department
    • Oregon Health Authority
  • State of Vermont
    • Agency of Administration

Non-U.S. Governments, Agencies, and Ministries

  • Canada
    • Department of National Defence
  • Commonwealth of Australia
  • European Union
    • European Commission
      • Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety
      • Directorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs
      • Directorate-General for Research and Innovation
      • Research Executive Agency
    • European Defence Agency
    • European Parliament
  • Government of Japan
  • Iraq
    • Kurdistan Regional Government
  • People’s Republic of China
    • Jinan Water Resources Bureau
  • Republic of Korea
    • Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs
  • United Arab Emirates
    • Embassy of the United Arab Emirates
  • United Kingdom
    • Defence Science and Technology Laboratory
    • Department of Health
    • Department for Transport
    • Foreign & Commonwealth Office
    • Ministry of Defence
    • National Institute for Health Research
    • Public Health England
    • Transport for London

International Organizations

  • BasicNeeds
  • NATO
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
  • World Bank
  • World Health Organization

Colleges and Universities

  • Boston University
  • Columbia University
    • Columbia University Medical Center
  • The Evergreen State College
  • Florida International University
  • The George Washington University
  • Harvard University
    • Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Indiana University
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • NORC at the University of Chicago
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • Research Foundation of the City University of New York
  • Singapore Management University
  • Tufts University
  • University of Arizona, Tucson
  • University of Arkansas
  • University of California
    • University of California, Berkeley
    • University of California, Los Angeles
    • University of California, San Diego
  • University of Maryland
  • University of Michigan
  • The University of Nevada, Reno
  • The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • University of Southern California
  • The University of Texas at Tyler
  • University of Washington
  • Vanderbilt University

Foundations

  • Aetna Foundation
  • Baton Rouge Area Foundation
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation
  • The California Endowment
  • Carnegie Corporation of New York
  • CHDI Foundation
  • The Commonwealth Fund
  • Communities Foundation of Texas
  • Una Chapman Cox Foundation
  • DICK’S Sporting Good Foundation
  • Elizabeth Dole Foundation
  • Education Endowment Foundation
  • Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  • The Health Foundation
  • Health Strategies of New Hampshire, Inc.
  • The Helmsley Charitable Trust
  • The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
  • The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • The Klarman Family Foundation
  • Laughing Gull Foundation
  • Henry Luce Foundation
  • MacArthur Foundation
  • Nellie Mae Education Foundation
  • McCormick Tribune Foundation
  • Richard King Mellon Foundation
  • New York State Health Foundation
  • The Pew Charitable Trusts
  • Anthony and Jeanne Pritzker Family Foundation
  • Raikes Foundation
  • The Rockefeller Foundation
  • Royal Society
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • The Stanton Foundation
  • The Wallace Foundation
  • Walton Family Foundation

Professional Associations

  • American Academy of Nursing
  • American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine
  • American Heart Association
  • American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association
  • National Governors Association

Other Nonprofit Organizations

  • American Institutes for Research
  • Baycrest
  • Brilliant Corners
  • California Mental Health Services Authority
  • California Travel and Tourism Commission
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • Center for Court Innovation
  • Children’s Hospital Boston
  • Collaborative Spine Research Foundation
  • College for All Texans Foundation
  • Corporation for Supportive Housing
  • Criterion Education, LLC
  • ExpandED Schools
  • Great Lakes Higher Education Corporation and Affiliates
  • Gulf of Mexico Alliance
  • Harlem Children’s Zone
  • Hepatitis Foundation International
  • International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)
  • JIR PFS (“Just-in-Reach” Pay for Success)
  • Kaiser Foundation Research Institute
  • Kentucky Valley Educational Cooperative
  • Korea Institute for Defense Analyses
  • Leading Educators
  • Mayor’s Fund to Advance New York City
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
  • The MITRE Corporation
  • The Monterrey Metropolitan Water Fund (Fondo de Agua Metropolitano de Monterrey)
  • National Academy of Sciences
  • National Committee for Quality Assurance
  • National Education Association
  • National Safety Council
  • Network for Teaching Entrepreneurship
  • New Leaders for New Schools
  • NYC Leadership Academy
  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • The Research Foundation for the State University of New York
  • The Scripps Research Institute
  • Silicon Valley Community Foundation
  • Single Stop USA
  • TNTP
  • United Way of Greater Cincinnati
  • Vera Institute of Justice
  • The Water Institute of the Gulf

Industry

  • Abt Associates
  • AIA Group
  • Alkermes
  • American Petroleum Institute
  • Amgen
  • ARCADIS
  • Biogen
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Canvas Medical
  • CarePoint Health
  • Chevron Corporation
  • Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc.
  • Health Services Advisory Group
  • ICF International, Inc.
  • IZA (Institute for the Study of Labor)
  • Janssen Scientific Affairs
  • KH Consulting Group
  • Kidney Disease Program of Glendale
  • Mathematica Policy Research
  • Microsoft
  • New York City Economic Development Corporation
  • Pillar Systems Corporation
  • Policy Studies Associates, Inc.
  • Renova Therapeutics
  • Resolution Economics
  • Schell Games
  • Symantec
  • Truven Health Analytics
  • United Healthcare Services, Inc.
  • VitalityHealth
  • Westat

Rand.org (READ MORE)


Committee of 300

The Committee of 300 is a product of the British East India Company’s Council of 300.  The East India Company was chartered by the British royal family in 1600.  It made vast fortunes in the opium drug trade with China and became the largest company on earth in its time.

Today, through many powerful alliances, the Committee of 300 rules the world and is the driving force behind the criminal agenda to create a “New World Order”, under a “Totalitarian Global Government”.

There is no need to use “they” or “the enemy” except as shorthand.  We know who “they”, the enemy, is.  The Committee of 300 with its “aristocracy”, its ownership of the U.S. Federal Reserve banking system, insurance companies, giant corporations, foundations, communications networks, presided over by a hierarchy of conspirators ~ this is the enemy.

Secret societies exist by deception.

Each is a hierarchy with an inner circle at the top, who deceives those below with lies, such as claiming a noble agenda; thus, duping them into following a web of compartmentalized complicity.

The inner circle of the Committee of 300 is the Order of the Garter, headed by Queen Elizabeth Windsor II.

THE COMMITTEE OF 300: A BRIEF HISTORY OF WORLD POWER

HIERARCHY CHART OF COMMITTEE OF 300

CONSPIRATOR’S HIERARCHY: THE STORY OF COMMITTEE OF 300  by Dr. John Coleman

The Millennium Report (READ MORE)


The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)

After the difficult negotiations of the 1919 Paris Peace Conference, a group of diplomats, financiers, generals, and lawyers concluded that Americans needed to be better prepared for significant responsibilities and decision-making in world affairs. With this in mind, they founded the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921 to “afford a continuous conference on international questions affecting the United States, by bringing together experts on statecraft, finance, industry, education, and science.”

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and students, civic and religious leaders, and other interested citizens in order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries. Founded in 1921, CFR takes no institutional positions on matters of policy. Our goal is to start a conversation in this country about the need for Americans to better understand the world.

cfr.org (READ MORE)


The Trilateral Commission

The Trilateral Commission is a non-governmental, policy-oriented forum that brings together leaders in their individual capacity from the worlds of business, government, academia, press and media, as well as civil society.  The Commission offers a global platform for open dialogue, reaching out to those with different views and engaging with decision makers from around the world with the aim of finding solutions to the great geopolitical, economic and social challenges of our time.  Its members share a firm belief in the values of rule of law, democratic government, human rights, freedom of speech and free enterprise that underpin human progress.  Members are also committed to supporting a rules-based international system, closer cooperation across borders and respect for the diversity of approaches to policy issues.

The Trilateral Commission was formed in 1973 by private citizens of Japan, Europe (European Union countries), and North America (United States and Canada) to foster closer cooperation among these core industrialized areas of the world with shared leadership responsibilities in the wider international system. Originally established for three years, our work has been renewed for successive triennia (three-year periods), most recently for a triennium to be completed in 2015.

When the first triennium of the Trilateral Commission was launched in 1973, the most immediate purpose was to draw together—at a time of considerable friction among governments—the highest-level unofficial group possible to look together at the key common problems facing our three areas. At a deeper level, there was a sense that the United States was no longer in such a singular leadership position as it had been in earlier post-World War II years, and that a more shared form of leadership—including Europe and Japan in particular—would be needed for the international system to navigate successfully the major challenges of the coming years.

The “growing interdependence” that so impressed the founders of the Trilateral Commission in the early 1970s has deepened into “globalization.” That interdependence also has ensured that the unduring effects of the financial crisis that began in 2008 has been felt in every nation and region. It has fundamentally shaken confidence in the international system as a whole. The Commission sees in these unprecedented events a stronger need for shared thinking and leadership by the Trilateral countries, who (along with the principal international organizations) have been the primary anchors of the wider international system. Doubts about whether and how this primacy will change do not diminish, and, if anything, have intensified the need to take into account the dramatic transformation of the international system. As relations with other countries become more mature—and power more diffuse—the leadership tasks of the original Trilateral countries need to be carried out with others to an increasing extent.

As our conviction has strengthened that the Commission remains more important than ever in helping our countries fulfill their shared leadership responsibilities in the wider international system, we too have changed. Our membership has widened to reflect broader changes in the world. Thus, the Japan Group has become a Pacific Asian Group, including in 2009 both Chinese and Indian members. Mexican members have been added to the North American Group. The European Group continues to widen in line with the enlargement of the EU. We are also continuing in this triennium our practice of inviting a number of participants from other key areas.

trilateral.org (READ MORE)


The Bilderberg Group

Since its inaugural meeting in 1954, Bilderberg has been an annual forum for informal discussions, designed to foster dialogue between Europe and North America. Every year, between 120-150 political leaders and experts from industry, finance, academia and the media are invited to take part in the meeting. About two thirds of the participants come from Europe and the rest from North America; one third from politics and government and the rest from other fields. The meeting is a forum for informal discussions about megatrends and major issues facing the world. The meetings are held under the Chatham House Rule, which states that participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s) nor of any other participant may be revealed. Thanks to the private nature of the meeting, the participants are not bound by the conventions of their office or by pre-agreed positions. As such, they can take time to listen, reflect and gather insights. There is no detailed agenda, no resolutions are proposed, no votes are taken, and no policy statements are issued.

The 2018 Bilderberg Meeting took place from 7 – 10 June in Turin, Italy. A press release including the list of topics and participants can be found here.

BilderbergMeetings.org (READ MORE)


The Jesuits (Society of Jesus)

See also DISTINGUISHED JESUITS, JESUIT APOLOGETIC, EARLY JESUIT GENERALS, and four articles on the history of the Society: PRE-1750, 1750-1773, 1773-1814, and 1814-1912.

The Society of Jesus is a religious order founded by Saint Ignatius Loyola. Designated by him “The Company of Jesus” to indicate its true leader and its soldier spirit, the title was Latinized into “Societas Jesu” in the Bull of Paul III approving its formation and the first formula of its Institute (“Regimini militantis ecclesia”, 27 Sept., 1540). The term “Jesuit” (of fifteenth-century origin, meaning one who used too frequently or appropriated the name of Jesus), was first applied to the society in reproach (1544-52), and was never employed by its founder, though members and friends of the society in time accepted the name in its good sense. The Society ranks among religious institutes as a mendicant order of clerks regular, that is, a body of priests organized for apostolic work, following a religious rule, and relying on alms for their support [Bulls of Pius V, “Dum indefessae”, 7 July, 1571; Gregory XIII, “Ascendente Domino”, 25 May, 1585].

As has been explained under the title “Ignatius Loyola”, the founder began his self-reform, and the enlistment of followers, entirely prepossessed with the idea of the imitation of Christ, and without any plan for a religious order or purpose of attending to the needs of the days. Unexpectedly prevented from carrying out this idea, he offered his services and those of his followers to the pope, “Christ upon Earth”, who at once employed him in such works as were most pressing at the moment. It was only after this and just before the first companions broke to go at the pope’s command to various countries, that the resolution to found an order was taken, and that Ignatius was commissioned to draw up Constitutions. This he did slowly and methodically; first introducing rules and customs and seeing how they worked. He did not codify them for the first six years. Then three years were given to formulating laws the wisdom of which had been proven by experiment. In the last six years of the Saint’s life the Constitutions so composed were finally revised and put into practice everywhere. This sequence of events explains at once how the society, though devoted to the following of Christ, as though there were nothing else in the world to care for, is also excellently adapted to the needs of the day. It began to attend to them before it began to legislate; and its legislation was the codification of those measures which had been proved by experience to be apt to preserve its preliminary religious principle among men actually devoted to the requirements of the Church in days not unlike our own.

The Society was not founded with the avowed intention of opposing Protestantism. Neither the papal letters of approbation nor the Constitutions of the order mention this as the object of the new foundation. When Ignatius began to devote himself to the service of the Church, he had probably not even heard of the names of the Protestant Reformers. His early plan was rather the conversion of Mohammedans, an idea which, a few decades after the final triumph of the Christians over the Moors in Spain, must have strongly appealed to the chivalrous Spaniards.

The name “Societas Jesu” had been born by a military order approved and recommended by Pius II in 1450, the purpose of which was to fight against the Turks and aid in spreading the Christian faith. The early Jesuits were sent by Ignatius first to pagan lands or to Catholic countries; to Protestant countries only at the special request of the pope and to Germany, the cradle-land of the Reformation, at the urgent solicitation of the imperial ambassador.

From the very beginning the missionary labours of the Jesuits among the pagans of India, Japan, China, Canada, Central and South America were as important as their activity in Christian countries. As the object of the society was the propagation and strengthening of the Catholic faith everywhere, the Jesuits naturally endeavored to counteract the spread of Protestantism. They became the main instruments of the Counter-Reformation; the re-conquest of southern and western Germany and Austria for the Church, and the preservation of the Catholic faith in France and other countries were due chiefly to their exertions.

NewAdvent.org (READ MORE)


The Zionists

The term “Zionism” was coined in 1890 by Nathan Birnbaum.

Its general definition means the national movement for the return of the Jewish people to their homeland and the resumption of Jewish sovereignty in the Land of Israel.

Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, Zionism has come to include the movement for the development of the State of Israel and the protection of the Jewish nation in Israel through support for the Israel Defense Forces.

From inception, Zionism advocated tangible as well as spiritual aims. Jews of all persuasions – left, right, religious and secular – formed the Zionist movement and worked together toward its goals.

Disagreements in philosophy led to rifts in the Zionist movement over the years, and a number of separate forms emerged.  Notably: Political Zionism; Religious Zionism; Socialist Zionism and Territorial Zionism.

JewishVirtualLibrary.org (READ MORE)


 The Federal Reserve | World Bank | International Monetary Fund | Bank for International Settlements

For the sake of brevity, please the following links for vast amounts of information.  The reader is also encouraged to independently research these “bankster” cartels listed above.

The History of Money

Bank for International Settlements


Empire of the City: Ring Of Power (The 3-City Empire)

[Vatican City – London City – Washington D.C.]

3 comments

Leave a Reply